Sen. Schumer Stands with Republicans in Opposing Iran Nuclear Agreement
As powerful Democrat comes out against White House position, GOP that much closer to having veto-proof majority for bill that could undermine diplomatic gains
Sen. Chuck Schumer, the influential Democrat from New York who will likely take over as Senate Minority Leader when colleague Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) finally steps aside, made it clear on Monday that he will stand with the Republican caucus in its bid to undermine ongoing efforts to reach a final nuclear agreement with Iran and other world powers.
Following a breakthrough last week that resulted in a framework agreement on Iran's nuclear program, Schumer cemented his position on the diplomatic efforts by endorsing a bill by Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Sen. Bob Mendendez (D-NJ) which would give Congress the right to review, and possibly reject, any final agreement made with Tehran over its nuclear program or the lifting of U.S.-imposed sanctions.
"This is a very serious issue that deserves careful consideration, and I expect to have a classified briefing in the near future," Schumer said in a statement first emailed to Politico. "I strongly believe Congress should have the right to disapprove any agreement and I support the Corker bill which would allow that to occur."
Long hawkish on foreign policy matters--and well-known as backing the desires of the pro-Israel establishment--Schumer's support for the bill is not surprising. As one senior Democratic aide told The Hill, "It's the same position he's always held."
However, given his increasingly powerful position in the party and the Senate, Schumer's public support for the Corker/Menendez bill now puts one of the Democrats most influential lawmakers at direct odds with the Obama administration which has repeatedly stated that congressional attempts to micro-manage negotiations with Iran would be paramount to diplomatic sabotage. With both the House and the Senate controlled by Republicans, the statement by Schumer puts the GOP that much closer to achieving a possible veto-proof majority in the Senate.
Speaking on Sunday, Sen. Corker said he believes he is getting close to having the necessary 67 votes in the Senate to override an Obama veto.
Robert Naiman, campaign director for Just Foreign Policy, points out Tuesday that other prominent Democrats in the Senate, as well as Independent Bernie Sanders, have all come out in favor of the recent framework agreement and can be expected to vote against Corker/Mendendez.
Over the weekend, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) confirmed her support for the deal by telling the hosts of The HuffPost Show that, "Finding a negotiated solution, something that works, something that doesn't involve trusting, something that involves verifying that Iran is not moving toward developing a nuclear weapon, that is our best promise in the region."
The worry remains, however, that Corker and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell can round up enough Democratic defectors over the next several weeks.
As the New York Times reports Tuesday:
The White House now views its central challenge as either negotiating a compromise with Mr. Corker or stopping enough Democrats from joining him so that he is short of a veto-proof majority, at least through June 30, the deadline to translate last week's preliminary agreement with Iran onto paper. After that, officials said, Mr. Obama may be in a stronger position to argue the merits of the accord.
Conservatives are in the meantime watching carefully to make sure Mr. Corker does not soften. "Corker is under enormous pressure from the White House to delay or weaken his own bill," said Dan Senor, a former Bush administration official. "But he has been strong on this issue, as has his committee and his caucus. I don't think he'll cave."
While the president said in an interview over the weekend that he was open to finding a way for Congress to "express itself" as long as it did not block his ability to carry out the agreement, aides worked on Monday to discourage the impression that he could accept even a nonbinding vote.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Sen. Chuck Schumer, the influential Democrat from New York who will likely take over as Senate Minority Leader when colleague Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) finally steps aside, made it clear on Monday that he will stand with the Republican caucus in its bid to undermine ongoing efforts to reach a final nuclear agreement with Iran and other world powers.
Following a breakthrough last week that resulted in a framework agreement on Iran's nuclear program, Schumer cemented his position on the diplomatic efforts by endorsing a bill by Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Sen. Bob Mendendez (D-NJ) which would give Congress the right to review, and possibly reject, any final agreement made with Tehran over its nuclear program or the lifting of U.S.-imposed sanctions.
"This is a very serious issue that deserves careful consideration, and I expect to have a classified briefing in the near future," Schumer said in a statement first emailed to Politico. "I strongly believe Congress should have the right to disapprove any agreement and I support the Corker bill which would allow that to occur."
Long hawkish on foreign policy matters--and well-known as backing the desires of the pro-Israel establishment--Schumer's support for the bill is not surprising. As one senior Democratic aide told The Hill, "It's the same position he's always held."
However, given his increasingly powerful position in the party and the Senate, Schumer's public support for the Corker/Menendez bill now puts one of the Democrats most influential lawmakers at direct odds with the Obama administration which has repeatedly stated that congressional attempts to micro-manage negotiations with Iran would be paramount to diplomatic sabotage. With both the House and the Senate controlled by Republicans, the statement by Schumer puts the GOP that much closer to achieving a possible veto-proof majority in the Senate.
Speaking on Sunday, Sen. Corker said he believes he is getting close to having the necessary 67 votes in the Senate to override an Obama veto.
Robert Naiman, campaign director for Just Foreign Policy, points out Tuesday that other prominent Democrats in the Senate, as well as Independent Bernie Sanders, have all come out in favor of the recent framework agreement and can be expected to vote against Corker/Mendendez.
Over the weekend, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) confirmed her support for the deal by telling the hosts of The HuffPost Show that, "Finding a negotiated solution, something that works, something that doesn't involve trusting, something that involves verifying that Iran is not moving toward developing a nuclear weapon, that is our best promise in the region."
The worry remains, however, that Corker and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell can round up enough Democratic defectors over the next several weeks.
As the New York Times reports Tuesday:
The White House now views its central challenge as either negotiating a compromise with Mr. Corker or stopping enough Democrats from joining him so that he is short of a veto-proof majority, at least through June 30, the deadline to translate last week's preliminary agreement with Iran onto paper. After that, officials said, Mr. Obama may be in a stronger position to argue the merits of the accord.
Conservatives are in the meantime watching carefully to make sure Mr. Corker does not soften. "Corker is under enormous pressure from the White House to delay or weaken his own bill," said Dan Senor, a former Bush administration official. "But he has been strong on this issue, as has his committee and his caucus. I don't think he'll cave."
While the president said in an interview over the weekend that he was open to finding a way for Congress to "express itself" as long as it did not block his ability to carry out the agreement, aides worked on Monday to discourage the impression that he could accept even a nonbinding vote.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, the influential Democrat from New York who will likely take over as Senate Minority Leader when colleague Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) finally steps aside, made it clear on Monday that he will stand with the Republican caucus in its bid to undermine ongoing efforts to reach a final nuclear agreement with Iran and other world powers.
Following a breakthrough last week that resulted in a framework agreement on Iran's nuclear program, Schumer cemented his position on the diplomatic efforts by endorsing a bill by Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Sen. Bob Mendendez (D-NJ) which would give Congress the right to review, and possibly reject, any final agreement made with Tehran over its nuclear program or the lifting of U.S.-imposed sanctions.
"This is a very serious issue that deserves careful consideration, and I expect to have a classified briefing in the near future," Schumer said in a statement first emailed to Politico. "I strongly believe Congress should have the right to disapprove any agreement and I support the Corker bill which would allow that to occur."
Long hawkish on foreign policy matters--and well-known as backing the desires of the pro-Israel establishment--Schumer's support for the bill is not surprising. As one senior Democratic aide told The Hill, "It's the same position he's always held."
However, given his increasingly powerful position in the party and the Senate, Schumer's public support for the Corker/Menendez bill now puts one of the Democrats most influential lawmakers at direct odds with the Obama administration which has repeatedly stated that congressional attempts to micro-manage negotiations with Iran would be paramount to diplomatic sabotage. With both the House and the Senate controlled by Republicans, the statement by Schumer puts the GOP that much closer to achieving a possible veto-proof majority in the Senate.
Speaking on Sunday, Sen. Corker said he believes he is getting close to having the necessary 67 votes in the Senate to override an Obama veto.
Robert Naiman, campaign director for Just Foreign Policy, points out Tuesday that other prominent Democrats in the Senate, as well as Independent Bernie Sanders, have all come out in favor of the recent framework agreement and can be expected to vote against Corker/Mendendez.
Over the weekend, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) confirmed her support for the deal by telling the hosts of The HuffPost Show that, "Finding a negotiated solution, something that works, something that doesn't involve trusting, something that involves verifying that Iran is not moving toward developing a nuclear weapon, that is our best promise in the region."
The worry remains, however, that Corker and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell can round up enough Democratic defectors over the next several weeks.
As the New York Times reports Tuesday:
The White House now views its central challenge as either negotiating a compromise with Mr. Corker or stopping enough Democrats from joining him so that he is short of a veto-proof majority, at least through June 30, the deadline to translate last week's preliminary agreement with Iran onto paper. After that, officials said, Mr. Obama may be in a stronger position to argue the merits of the accord.
Conservatives are in the meantime watching carefully to make sure Mr. Corker does not soften. "Corker is under enormous pressure from the White House to delay or weaken his own bill," said Dan Senor, a former Bush administration official. "But he has been strong on this issue, as has his committee and his caucus. I don't think he'll cave."
While the president said in an interview over the weekend that he was open to finding a way for Congress to "express itself" as long as it did not block his ability to carry out the agreement, aides worked on Monday to discourage the impression that he could accept even a nonbinding vote.